Thursday, February 26, 2015

Iran Hangs Obama and Attacks a US Carrier


             You don’t have to be an expert in world affairs to know that Iran and the US aren’t exactly friends. Since the Iran-Iraq War of the Reagan administration, the Western superpower and Middle Eastern nation have been in constant disagreement and have often engaged in outright hostility. Relations have soured even more since September 11th, after which President Bush dubbed Iran the “Axis of Evil.” In fact, relations have become so poor between the two nations that there are no formal diplomatic relations between the Republic of Iran and the United States.
            Despite their history of disagreement and tension, the two nations have started to cooperate, albeit uneasily. In 2014, they allied with one another against ISIL, and recently they have been engaging in nuclear talks in Geneva. Although the Iran-US relationship is by no means fixed and although their recent interactions have been marred by continued hostilities, many people have started to believe that the two nations are on their way to establishing peaceful and respectful diplomatic relations. That is, until Iranians hung President Obama and blew up a mock US aircraft carrier during naval drills.
On February 11, during Iran’s 36th anniversary celebration of the Islamic Revolution, Iranians burned an effigy of President Obama. Many citizens also carried signs depicting Secretary of State John Kerry as a devious fox while chanting “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.” The display was broadcast throughout the Middle Eastern nation and met with approval by key figures in the Iranian government, such as Defense Minister Hossein Deghan.
As if hanging the President did not send a strong enough message, on Wednesday, speedboats swarmed a life-size replica of the USS Nimitz, striking the vessel with missiles, rockets, and mortars. The simulation was called Great Prophet 9, and it was the centerpiece of training exercises of the Iranian Navy’s Revolutionary Guards. According to one video caption on a Fars report, “Iranian naval forces displayed their skills in targeting enemy vessels.”
Now, Nimitz-class carriers permanently patrol the water of the Persian gulf, something which Iran has always resented. By blowing up a ship designed in the image of these carriers, Iran is making its position clear; it may be cooperating with the United States on a few fronts at the moment, but the Western nation remains its archenemy. Not only that, but Iran may be attempting to show the United States that, if the worst occurs, the nation is not afraid to go to war against the American superpower. Iran can and will sink a US warship if conflict were to break out.
The navy’s Revolution Guards Corps also conducted mine-laying exercises. Ali Fadavi, commander of the Iranian naval force, stated that this portion of their war-games was “the most important concern of the Americans,” for Iran has “the most advanced sea mines which [the US] cannot…[imagine].” Another commander stated that the navy wasn’t trying to show off all its strength with these drills, but rather carry out simple practice exercises. Apparently, Iran still has many “capabilities which will remain covert and hidden before being used in action.”
Well, so much for improved relations. On a governmental and social level, Iran’s hatred of America just seems to grow. If there was any lingering doubt whether Iran still viewed the US as Public Enemy Number 1, there really cannot be now. We are Iran’s archenemy, and Iran is making sure that we are very much aware of this fact.
The US, however, doesn’t seem to be alarmed. The White House did not issue a formal response to the burning of President Obama’s effigy and, in regards to the naval attack, US Commander Kevin Stephens simply said, “We're quite confident of our naval forces' ability to defend themselves.”
            Now, I’m not one to support feeding international conflict, but I can’t help think that it seems a little arrogant, even dangerous, that the United States has completely discounted Iran’s recent moves. We have a problem with the Iranian government; they hate us and see us as hypocritical, selfish monsters. I think it’s our duty, as self-proclaimed “international peacekeeper” to address these attacks. If we ignore them, if we continue to belittle and discount Iran, aren’t we just setting ourselves up for future conflict with Iran and other Middle Eastern nations?
What do you think about these attacks? How will they affect the American-Iranian relationships? Do you support the United States’ dismissive response or do you think we should act differently in the face of such attacks? Most of all, do you think there is any hope for US-Iran relations in the near future?

Sources:




5 comments:

Annika Jaques said...

Sam,
I would have to say that I agree with how America handled the "attacks." Iran's anti-America protests and military training stunts seem like a child yelling to be heard because it wants to be the center of attention. If President Obama were to give a formal respond it would be the equivalent of a parent addressing a child's screaming fit and in the end only add to the hype Iran was trying to create. Further fueling the fire of hate between the two countries who have just started to get back on speaking terms. I do not think that these attack are a warning of Iranian plans to attack America any time soon. I also have full faith in this country to protect its citizens from any threat Iran may pose. As for the very strained relationship between American and Iran, I think that talks will be able to continue, regarding nuclear weapons and ISIS. ISIS has for the moment given American and Iran a common enemy we can work together on eliminating. I think that because of this both countries will put aside Iran's display's and fight together.

kside0626 said...

I believe the U.S. made the right choice by ignoring this Iranian ‘protest’. Effigy burning and blowing up fake ships has no real effect on our nation or its security. The U.S. has much larger, more real foreign issues to deal with involving ISIS to entrap itself in such petty issues. In addition, the U.S. cannot afford to escalate tensions with Iran at this time. Though relations with Middle Eastern nations have been shaky in the past, we are on our way to improving these relations. With the rising threat of ISIS, the U.S. cannot afford to make Iran an enemy. With the history of aggression between our two nations, some resentment from Iran is to be expected, but the U.S. cannot retaliate like some disgruntled child. Instead, we must take the high-road, focus on more important foreign issues, and work on rebuilding our relationships with Middle-Eastern nations like Iran. This issue means virtually nothing and will most likely not escalate especially if the U.S. ignores it. I agree with how our nation reacted.

Unknown said...

Sam,
The way Iran handles itself is similar to how North Korea does it; cause a stir, make some threats, act like they're going to follow through, then let it peter out.The US is handling this situation correctly in my eyes, though its important to realize that this alliance with Iran is truly temporary; there are factors from both sides endangering it, from the Iranian actions you spoke about in this article to the way the US has been handling our relationship with Israel, and specifically, how we are playing a chess game with Netanyahu.
There needs to be some kind of direct stance taken in our relations to Iran, and soon hopefully. Its frustrating, as a citizen of this country, to see our government playing these diplomatic games, even if what they are doing in the moment deserves approval.

Anonymous said...

Sam,
While I see how it can be frustrating that the US just sort of swept this issue under the rug, I do agree with the Annika that it was best to just let it go. This is a hard idea to grasp considering the amount of threats and attacks our country has endured and fought back against, however in the case of Iran, the show they put on for the world seems to leave behind no real eminent threat. It was just that, a show, to shine attention and light n=back on their fading country.

If Obama officially addressed the issue, the US would be fueling the poor behavior, allowing the Iranian government to feel successful in their plan, and even worse more powerful. I agree with Kevin that in this particular situation, it was best for the US to take the "high-road" and protect ourselves from more enemies and bad blood with Iran and their allies.

Anonymous said...

I agree with Sara: Iran's naval simulation was childish and designed to get some sort of reaction. While this simulation should color US policy toward Iran, this attention-seeking stunt was a desperate attention grab. It might be prudent for diplomats and lawmakers to bring this incident up if we make a deal with Iran on it's nuclear practices, in order to shame Iran into concessions benefiting the US. Iran has embarrassed itself, which could be used as an opportunity as long as it's ignored mostly, but not entirely.