For
the first time after Russia’s participation in combat missions in Syria, the
U.S. and Russia will meet in Vienna on Friday. Because Russian intervention
interferes with Washington’s plan to defeat the Islamic State, it is imperative
that the two countries address U.S. concern about Russia’s airstrikes against the opponents of the Assad’s
regime. The US hopes for a political transition in Syria
that would remove Mr. Assad from power while Moscow hopes for a "long term resolution can be achieved on the
basis of a political process with the participation of all political forces,
ethnic and religious groups" that can be achieved by a “positive dynamic in the fighting” (provided by Russian
forces). This meeting is also influenced by Mr. Putin’s invitation to Syrian
ruler Assad to visit Moscow on Tuesday where they discussed operations against Syria’s
opponents. Assad’s acceptance not only displays defiance to the West and Russia’s
effort to position itself as the main diplomat in the region, but Assad’s
growing confidence. It was the first time he left the country since the civil
war conflict began over four years ago. Assad’s visit to Moscow and the
military intervention is important because it may position Russia as Syria’s
closest ally and diplomatic partner, even overtaking Iran’s attempt to increase
its role in Syria.
Additionally, Moscow
and Syria have had history. In September 2013, Russia’s support of a plan that
allowed Assad to hand over his chemical weapons halted US military action
against Assad. Russia first began showing support of Assad when they promised
to eliminate terrorists abroad, the approximately 4,000 people from the former
Soviet Union that came to Syria, were trained and taught by the Islamic State
and are now fighting the Syrian government.
Russian
military intervention is already boosting the confidence of the Syrian
government. The Syrian government forces had been losing ground, but now, the government in Damascus is attempting to regain territory once considered out of Assad’s control.
Syrian, Iranian and Hezbollah fighters backed by Russian planes began capturing
many villages along the city’s southern outskirts on Friday, the government’s
biggest advance since Russian intervention. Mr. Putin said the Syrian
government had “achieved significantly positive results” and was prepared to
help lead the country to end the conflict. Russia is ready to “not only to take
the path of military action in the fight against terrorism, but to take the
path of a political solution.” However, many question Russia’s claim that it is
targeting Islamic State militants. Many of the airstrikes have affected mainstream
rebels, some of which have been trained and equipped by Washington. In addition,
the Russian embassy’s claims that Russian forces hadn’t caused local casualties
in recent days, but the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights has proven that Russian
and Syrian combined forces have taken a large humanitarian toll. At least 127
civilians, including 36 children and 34 women, have been killed by Russian
airstrikes.
What
do you think about the situation?
What
are Russia’s true intentions? Does Russia’s history with Syria have any significance?
Are
Russia’s actions in direction opposition to Washington’s plans?
1 comment:
Putin has been agitating Washington throughout its entire involvement in the Syrian Civil War. For years now, the US has been trying to persuade Al Assad to step down from power, and in every effort Washington has made to support the Syrian Rebels, Moscow has helped Assad continue to fight back. It's hard to tell weather or not Putin has been assisting Al Assad with an "enemy of my enemy is my friend" type policy to oppose the US, but his constant opposition and targeting of "islamic state members" is beginning to raise some flags. I doubt that Putin is trying to start another cold war with the US, but I believe that he is trying to send some kind of message to Washington with taking a stance agains them.
Post a Comment